Making Oral Arguments Accessible
AI-generated transcripts of real arguments before real appellate court judges for legal professionals, researchers, and the curious public
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is unique among federal appellate courts because its jurisdiction is defined by subject matter, not geography, including patent law, trademark law, international trade, government contracts, veteran's benefits, federal employment, and Tucker Act claims. Read more about the Federal Circuit
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is often regarded as the second most powerful court due to its influence over federal regulatory and administrative law. It has geographic jurisdiction limited to Washington, D.C., but hears a high volume of appeals involving federal agencies. Read more about the D.C. Circuit
Oral argument transcripts are valuable public records that capture the spoken proceedings between appellate judges and the attorneys presenting a case. While appellate decisions are ultimately decided on the written briefs and the law, oral arguments provide critical insight into how the judges view the case, what issues they consider most important, and how well the parties are able to respond to the court's concerns.
Legal Strategy & Research: Attorneys studying similar issues rely on transcripts to understand how courts have questioned legal positions, interpreted precedent, or reacted to specific arguments.
Transparency & Accountability: Transcripts provide a window into judicial decision-making and ensure the public can scrutinize how justice is administered.
Media & Policy Analysis: Journalists and policy analysts use them to track the judiciary’s approach to key constitutional, regulatory, and social issues.
Historical Record: For cases involving landmark rulings or high-profile disputes, oral arguments become part of the public’s historical understanding of the law’s development.
⚠️ AI Transcripts contain inaccuracies. These are not official court records.
These transcripts contain errors, particularly with respect to speaker identification, technical terminology, or complex legal references. They are not official records of the proceedings.
The transcripts provided on this website are automatically generated using artificial intelligence (AI) tools and are intended solely for informational and research purposes.
The site owner makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability of the transcripts for any purpose. Reliance on any part of these transcripts is at your own risk.
For official records of oral arguments, please consult the relevant court’s authorized sources.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of this disclaimer.
We are interested in your feedback. Use the feedback form to submit your comments or questions.